I gotta have my orange juice.

Jesu, Juva

Creation

with 9 comments

Creationists insist that the amazing world of the Bear Hunt sprung up ex nihilo for the purpose of telling a beautiful story.

But we know better. By Scientific observation and inductive reasoning we can prove the existence of enormous negative page numbers. We know that inductive reasoning functions as incontestable proof, because we are the keepers and guardians of the sacred truth that all worlds are impersonal machines and not stories. Worlds have no plots, and are filled only with particles, not characters. Creationists are stupid. So are all authors, artists, composers and poets — they are all conspiring in a tremendous lie about worlds and Science (all rise!).

Written by Scott Moonen

August 28, 2012 at 8:55 am

9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Scott Moonen

    August 28, 2012 at 9:08 am

  2. If you want to believe in the creative arts, that’s fine. But don’t make your kids study it. In another couple centuries, I’m sure the arts won’t even exist. There’s no evidence for it . . .

    Scott Moonen

    August 28, 2012 at 10:11 am

  3. Art is an opiate for the masses, perpetuating the seductive lie that there are such things as purpose, person, plot and author.

    Scott Moonen

    August 28, 2012 at 10:38 am

  4. Apropos this topic, Eric Metaxas just reviewed N. D. Wilson’s excellent book, Notes From the Tilt-a-Whirl: http://www.breakpoint.org/bpcommentaries/entry/13/20142

    Scott Moonen

    August 28, 2012 at 3:25 pm

  5. Everything is meaningless, pointless and hopeless. Therefore, I must tear away your blindfold that keeps you dangerously convinced of purpose, beauty, and heaven. You are the ones we should lock up to prevent future generations from being corrupted.

    Cheri-CreationScience4Kids

    August 29, 2012 at 4:38 pm

  6. Peter Leithart comments that “unbelief ends up sacrificing economics and literature as well as religion.”

    Scott Moonen

    November 19, 2012 at 2:26 pm

  7. […] One of the things I appreciate about James Jordan is his careful attention to Biblical chronology. This gives us a deeper understanding of Scripture, in ways far beyond dating creation. […]

  8. […] is a real-life story, not a machine. For it to have an honest-to-goodness literary backstory rather than a mechanistic […]

  9. […] that the universe is roughly 6000 years old. Of course the universe has the appearance of age; doesn’t any work of art? It is true that not all genealogies capture every generation for theological reasons, but it seems […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: