I gotta have my orange juice.

Jesu, Juva

Wisdom

leave a comment »

James Jordan and his associates have developed a rich set of teaching around biblical themes related to wisdom. The following is an attempt to summarize key aspects of this teaching. To develop this, I leveraged Anthropic’s AI models to summarize a large set of lectures and publications from Jordan and others including Peter Leithart. I’ve done significant editing of my own on the result and I believe this reflects their teaching reasonably well.

For Jordan and his associates, wisdom is closely associated with the second of three stages that runs through creation, covenant history, biblical literature, and the Christian life:

We can begin with the phrase “prophet, priest, and king.” This is the order normally heard from preachers and theologians. But it is not really the Biblical order. The age of priests ran from Moses to Saul, the age of Kings from Saul to the end of the Kingdom, and the age of prophets from Elijah to Jesus. If we believe in any kind of development and maturation of the kingdom of God in history, we shall have to admit that king is more than priest, and prophet more than king. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet,” 2002)

The offices are stages, not simultaneous roles:

We think of priests and kings and prophets as all existing at the same time. They’re all 30 years old, and the priest leads in worship, and the king runs the nation, and the prophet tells them what God wants them to hear. Now, there’s a certain amount of truth to that, but that is only secondary to the most important thing about prophet, priest, and king, which is that they exist in historical order.” (“One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1: Bread & Wine)

Jordan observes that there is a progression of offices and ages: priest, king, and prophet. Priesthood is the age of childhood, law, and rote obedience in a small holy place.

A priest is by definition… the word kohen in Hebrew… means palace servant. A priest is a palace servant… And the priest has a very simple life. All a priest has to do is to keep the incense burning so that God’s house smells good, and to prepare the food for offering on the sacrifices. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

Kingship is the age of adulthood, wisdom, and discerning rule over a wider land.

To be a king is not just a matter of obeying and doing right and not doing wrong. The king has to rule by wisdom… [Solomon’s] wisdom involves some subtlety. And I’ll tell you the secret of wisdom and the secret of politics, which is something priests don’t have to worry about… The king has to choose between the lesser of two evils. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

Prophecy is the age of elderhood, vision, and world-shaping speech.

If we move from child to maturity, then with kings, from priest to king, with prophet we get to eldership… At the end of life, you don’t do things anymore. It’s speaking. The king acts, the elder speaks. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

No one becomes a king without first having been a priest, and no one passes from one stage to the next except through crisis, breaking, and a genuine kind of death.

From this movement from priest to king (from law to wisdom), Jordan develops a cluster of wisdom-related themes: maturation and glory-to-glory, crisis and death, the limping elder, long time sense, the wisdom canon, Solomon and Job and Jacob, the feast, the bride, and the prophetic overflow at the far end of the sequence. Wisdom is always coming out of a grave. It limps because it has been wounded; it waits because it has been taught by time; it eats wine where it once ate bread; and it knows itself to be a gift that only those who have consented to die can finally receive.

In our lives… God is in the process of making us into bread and then from time to time breaking us. And that process of breaking your life and the suffering that you go through gives you wisdom so that you become more like wine. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

Bread is for priests. Bread is simple… Wine is complicated; very easy to turn wine to vinegar if you’re not careful. It takes wisdom to put that stuff together and put it in a dark room and have it become Cabernet Sauvignon rather than vinegar. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

Priest, King, and Prophet

Jordan teaches that priest, king, and prophet are not three simultaneous offices sitting side by side (as reformed shorthand often has it) but often three successive stages of maturation. Each has a different relation to God’s word and world. The priest receives the word as written code and carries it out without improvisation: inspect the beast, read the rule in Leviticus, perform the rite.

The priest is a servant, specially a palace servant… The priest as such has very simple jobs: He inspects the animal brought for sacrifice; he helps the layman offer it; he inspects for leprosy… It is simple: You either obey or you don’t. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

The king receives the word as internalized principle and must apply it in situations the code never anticipated. He adjudicates between competing goods and chooses among lesser evils; he wields the sword; he does the work the law cannot accomplish.

A king has a different and far more mature task. When we get to the kingdom era, we get wisdom literature. Wisdom concerns not simple questions of right and wrong, but questions of what is wise and what is unwise in any given situation, new situations not specifically covered by the Law. More than this, the king must usually decide not between right and wrong, but between two evils… An example of such kingly wisdom is seen when Solomon must decide between the claims of the two harlots in 1 Kings 3. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

The prophet, finally, speaks a word that no longer describes or adjudicates but reframes; his sentence bends history.

A prophet is someone who by his words alone tears down an old world and creates a new one. His words cause people to think in a new way. He does not merely repeat what has been said before, or apply the old ways into new situations. He provides a new vision, a vision encompassing death and resurrection. Once a true prophet has spoken, no one can continue to think in the old comfortable way any longer. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

This pattern is exhibited in the Bible’s own literary structure. Torah is the priestly book; the histories and the wisdom literature are the kingly books; the prophets and Revelation are the prophetic books. The pattern is reflected in Israel’s political history: Moses and Aaron give way to Saul and David and Solomon, who give way in turn to Elijah and Jeremiah and Ezekiel.

In a larger way, the whole Adamic period is priestly, down to Noah. God gives the right to exercise capital punishment to mankind through Noah, and thus we enter a larger kingly period. With the age of the Patriarchs, we come to a larger prophetic period… With Moses, the new world arrives as a new creation, with Israel as a nation at its heart… [which] starts a new cycle within the nation of Israel: priestly (Sinaitic), kingly (Kingdom), prophetic (Remnant), and full prophetic (Restoration). (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

The pattern is repeated in the locations of redemption: garden, then land, then world.

Adam was created to be a priest in the Garden. He was exiled into the Land… Cain went out and built a city, and thereby became the first king… Toward the end of this period, the prophet Enoch began to prophesy judgment in the larger World… Then after the death and resurrection of the world, Noah came as a prophet to set up the new world. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

The pattern repeats with food: bread, then wine, then fire.

You have bread in the morning when you wake up… wine is for relaxing when the work is finished. Another difference… is you don’t ordinarily give a lot of wine to your children… But right now, as little kids, you can have all the bread you want. And when you grow up and become an adult, you don’t eat bread anymore. You just drink wine. Or beer, which is liquid bread… See, this difference between beginning and end, between child and adult, corresponds to one of the most important differences between priests and king in the Bible. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

It repeats within each human life: a child who must obey rules, a young adult who must judge in complexity, an elder whose words are few but weighty. It is the pattern of Jesus’s own life, for he is the Greater Priest, the Greater King, and the Greater Prophet; he passes through each stage in his own career, climbing the cross as priest, ruling from the Father’s right hand as king, sending the Spirit as prophet.

We are placed in union with Jesus, and the deep pattern of His life is given to us. Ultimately, the pattern of Jesus’ life from childhood to full maturity, from priest to king to prophet, arises from the fact that as Son He is eternally immature, eternally adult, and eternally fully mature. By eating His body and drinking His blood, we are restored and renewed so that we can move properly through these three phases of life. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

From Law to Wisdom

Jordan is especially interested in the middle transition from priest to king, from law to wisdom. This is where much of Christian life happens, and it is the transition where much of the Christian church gets stuck. Law is given because children need rules; it provides the definite shape obedience must take before a person is mature enough to improvise. The Levitical code and the Ten Words train Israel in holiness. But the law was never meant to be the adult form of obedience. It is, as Paul indicates, a tutor or guardian: a role that expires at majority. When Israel grows up, the child’s catechism becomes the man’s internal bearing; what was once a wall around the heart becomes a spring within it.

In Proverbs chapter 8 and verse 15, wisdom says, “by me kings reign.” This is the important statement about wisdom. Wisdom is for kings. Wisdom is not for priests. Priests have law. Kings have wisdom. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Rule I”)

Solid food is for the mature, who because of practice have their senses trained to discern good and evil. Ah, that takes us back to Genesis 2. Knowledge of good and evil. Mature people have knowledge of good and evil. Babies don’t have knowledge of good and evil… The first stage of the Word of God is law, rules for kids. The second stage of the Word of God is wisdom for those who have acquired knowledge of good and evil and are ready to move out of the kindergarten. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Rule I”)

The king is not going to have such wisdom unless he learns the Law first. Wisdom builds on law, and king builds on priest. There must be a “priestly phase” of our lives, during which we learn wisdom through obedience and struggle, before we enter a “kingly phase” and have wisdom to give to others. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

Wisdom is the name of that mature bearing. It is law breathed in, experienced, turned over, tested against difficulty, and then applied by judgment. Jordan’s favorite illustration is Solomon and the two harlots. No rule in Leviticus tells the king how to decide who is the baby’s mother; he must read hearts. He must issue a command he does not mean literally (the sword-threat) as a way of exposing the true love that no written code could adjudicate.

What is the first big picture of wisdom that we have after Solomon asked for wisdom? What’s the next story we read? The story of the two harlots… Now, Solomon probably said, let me consult Deuteronomy and see what it says about how to deal with this. There wasn’t anything in there. It required wisdom to deal with that. It wasn’t written down. Now, you don’t get wisdom unless you live under law for a while and internalize the rules; then you grow up and you have your senses exercised to discern good and evil. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Death I”)

The king is therefore more than a priest, not less. He has not escaped the law; he has metabolized it. And because he has, he is free to bend the letter in service of the spirit, knowing from within why the law said what it said in the first place.

The priest can choose between right and wrong, between obeying and disobeying, because his life is simple. The king has to choose between the lesser of two evils. And that is always true in politics… The best example in common life is a commander on the battlefield. If you are a private in the infantry, all you’ve got to do is obey… But if you are a king in the military, if you’re a commander, you have to pick some guys out for suicide missions… That’s not a right and wrong decision. That’s a lesser of two evils decision. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

This has a pastoral corollary. An officer of the church who has never lived the law cannot rule wisely, and an officer who has only ever lived the law, and has never passed beyond it into judgment, will rule rigidly and do harm. Wisdom requires both. The priest who has not yet become a king is a child; the king who has not first been a priest is a tyrant.

Because of sin, human beings apart from grace are bad priests, bad kings, and bad prophets. As bad priests, they are disobedient and rebellious… As bad priests, they are not willing to be learners for a time. They move right away into the trial-and-error phase that should come later, and often blab away their opinions to others, trying to be prophets to them when they have little useful to impart. As bad kings, they rule poorly. Because they refused to serve, they don’t know how to rule well… As bad prophets they give bad advice and set in motion evil trends that move history in the wrong direction. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

What one must become is a priest who has grown up, whose obedience is now a formed second nature rather than an external rule, and who can therefore be trusted with the sword, the cup, and the counsel.

Notice that you don’t cease to be a priest when you become a king. The rulebook is still there, and occasionally you have to go back and consult it. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

Crisis, Death, and the Limping Elder

No one moves from one stage to the next without a death, a death which should not be over spiritualized. The pattern is set in Genesis 2: Adam enters a tardema (a deep, death-like sleep) and his side is opened. When he wakes, he is not merely married; he is glorified, for the woman is his glory, and she could not come forth except through this cutting. Glorification, from the beginning, has the shape of a tomb with a garden on the far side.

Yahweh God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man. And he slept. That is a special word… a totally different word in Hebrew. And he slept, and he took one of his ribs and closed up the flesh of that place. Now, you know, if you were sound asleep and somebody ripped a bone out of your side, I think you’d wake up. That didn’t happen because this was death sleep. . . . The Hebrew word is, the verb is radam, to fall into death’s sleep. Tardema is the noun. He was experiencing tardema, death’s sleep. . . . This place, this tardema place, is where visions take place. (James B. Jordan, 2016 BH Conference, “Good Death and Transfiguration”)

Very important for us to understand that God put Adam into a death situation and then resurrected and glorified him. How do we know that Adam was glorified?… Adam was not glorified. Then, after he woke up, he was glorified. Why? Because the woman is the [glory] of the man, according to Paul… So this is the first moment of glorification in history. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Rule I”)

That’s what happens when you pass through really serious death sleep; you get ripped in half and you get put back together again as one flesh and you’re glorified. Doesn’t look so bad does it? That’s what death is. (James B. Jordan, 2016 BH Conference, “Good Death and Transfiguration”)

Every subsequent movement of covenant history repeats this pattern. The wilderness generation dies so the new generation can inherit. The priestly order under Eli collapses so the kingly order under David can rise. Solomon’s temple burns so the prophetic word can be heard without its shelter. And in Jesus the pattern is both fulfilled and universalized: his death is the door every Christian must walk through in order to enter an adult inheritance.

That crisis is seen in history when at the end of Israel’s priestly period in the days of Eli, God kills Eli’s two sons, Hophni and Phinehas, and he kills Eli because of their sins. And he tears the tabernacle in half… And he brings it back again with David and Solomon. And Solomon builds a temple and the priesthood is restored with the king. And at the end of that period… God kills the sons of King Zedekiah… And he starts again with Daniel and Ezekiel as very young men as prophets starting something new on the other side of that second death and judgment experience. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

In an individual human life, the death is often the mid-life crisis, the shattering of the plans and identities one had constructed in the priestly, rule-keeping years. Jordan is matter-of-fact about this. Wine cannot be made unless the grape is crushed, and it must ferment in the dark. The structures of a baked life are broken open so that the complex, time-requiring fermentation of wisdom can begin. His lecture series One Life, Many Deaths emphasizes this point: a single biography contains many little deaths, and each of them is a doorway to a larger measure of authority and glory for those who do not refuse them.

In most people’s lives, there is a crisis in the middle of their life, just as there is a great crisis in the middle of history when Jesus comes. He doesn’t come at the end of history or at the beginning. He comes in the middle of history. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 2: Breaking the Bread)

You know, when men are young, they think they’re going to accomplish certain things. You get to be 40, 45, somewhere in there, and one day you look in the mirror and you realize you’re not going to accomplish all the things you thought you were going to accomplish… And something dies… And that becomes a great crisis in the lives of many men. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 2)

At some point human beings begin to lose their strength; they begin to die in preparation for their final death and transformation into glory. Sometimes this death begins with some kind of mid-life crisis. With women it is associated with menopause. With men it is associated with the loss of power and the realization that they will not accomplish everything they had hoped to accomplish when they were young. This is when human beings start to become elders. Their kingly wisdom matures into prophecy, the ability to speak life-changing words. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

You’re going through a real hard time. And in the middle of that real hard time, it seems as if Jesus isn’t there either… This is what the Puritans call the desertion… It’s what the medievals call the dark night of the soul… That’s part of going through the cross. On the cross, Jesus didn’t have any sense that the Father and the Spirit were with him, did he? Real death is a sense of abandonment in the midst of suffering. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 2)

The man who emerges on the far side of such a death has a limp. Jacob at Peniel is the paradigm: he wrestles all night, receives a new name, and emerges forever lame. The limp is not his punishment; it is his ordination.

A bruised thigh was Jacob’s reward, so that for the rest of his life he limped (Gen. 32:25–32). His limp was not a sign of his defeat, but of his victory… As Jacob crossed joyously over the river into the Promised Land, the sun rose behind him… Jacob could be assured of victory because of his limp. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

The message of Peniel is this: It was God who raised up Esau, Isaac, and Laban to wrestle with Jacob. All those years when Jacob wrestled with these three enemies, it was really God with whom he had to do. And why? Not to punish Jacob, but to train him, to make him strong. Just as a father gets down on the floor and wrestles with his children, so God had wrestled with Jacob. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

Every pastor, father, magistrate, and elder Jordan knows of has a similar wound somewhere in his story. The limp is the visible sign of earned authority: this person has been through something, has lost something, has failed at something, and has learned from it. The wound is what makes one’s counsel trustworthy. A wise man who is not limping somewhere is almost certainly not yet wise.

The Church always limps, because she always has the bruised heel. There are always embarrassments. There is always infighting. There are always inadequate responses. There are always problems… What looks like chaos to us, as the Church limps in circles, is from the perspective of eternity a beautiful dance, outwardly spiraling; a dance that will eventually draw all the universe into itself. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

Long Time Sense, Patience, and the Slow Ferment of Wisdom

Wisdom requires patience; it requires what Jordan calls a long time sense. It operates on large scales that modern people, and especially modern evangelicals, have difficulty grasping: generational, centennial, eschatological. The Garden itself was built on a postponement: Adam and Eve would eventually eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, but they were to wait until God said so. They could not wait.

Right now, Adam can’t have the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. He’s not supposed to. But when God says it will be food for you, that means eventually he will eat of it. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Rule I”)

The refusal of patience is the original folly, and every subsequent impatience recapitulates it. Israel demands a king before the time and receives Saul. A church demands revival and gets a technique. A father demands that his son be mature before he has finished being a child, and produces neither.

Solomon says, I’m too young… So give thy servant an understanding heart, a hearing heart, to judge thy people, to discern between good and evil… Now that’s the opposite of Adam’s attitude, you see. Adam’s attitude was, hey, I’ve been around for 14 hours already. I am ready to have knowledge of good and evil. Solomon says, I’m not old enough. He’s humble. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Rule I”)

It took ninety-nine years for Abraham to mature to the point of being made a prophet, and it took ninety-seven years for Jacob to prevail with God. Yet, great as their privileges were, there was more to come. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

Abraham had matured through patient faith… Jacob had matured through wrestling faith to the point where he could wrestle with God and prevail. In both cases the development took a long time and involved patience and perseverance. And here again, the contrast is with Adam, Ham, Lot, and Esau, who were impatient, and who as a result never attained this high standing with God. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

Wisdom is intrinsically slow because it is intrinsically fermented. It is the product of a certain kind of weather acting over a certain amount of time on a life that has been broken open. This is why Ecclesiastes belongs to the wisdom canon as the necessary shadow of Proverbs: Proverbs assumes the sufficient time horizon in which obedience bears its characteristic fruit; Ecclesiastes reckons with the horizon of mortality, within which even wisdom cannot guarantee results. The mature man lives in both simultaneously, working as if both Proverbs and Ecclesiastes are true. Short-horizon piety gives up too quickly when Proverbs appears to fail. Pure Ecclesiastes resignation mistakes mystery for meaninglessness. The wise man can farm the earth patiently while acknowledging that his barns will one day belong to someone else.

At the center of this section is the statement, “all things are wearisome.” … If we look at things under the perspective of the judgment of God, then everything looks different… He still says, yeah, it’s vapor, but it’s not wearisome. God is going to bring an explanation to it all. God is going to bring it all under judgment. And so you can rejoice in all of it, even when things are not very pleasant. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Survey of Ecclesiastes”)

Wisdom and Death: Why the Wise Man Must Die

Jordan teaches that wisdom is oriented toward and structured by death. This is the burden of his 2005 conference on Ecclesiastes and wisdom literature and the 2016 conference on death. The wise man is the one who has come to know his own mortality at close quarters, and wisdom’s depth is proportionate to that knowledge. A young man may be intelligent, gifted, even trained; but if he has not yet buried anyone, watched a work of his collapse, or confronted his own limits, his counsel will be fragile. Wisdom about death is not a morbid appendix to wisdom; it is the center.

Death was originally intended to be what Jesus goes through on the Sabbath day. And awakes to higher glory… But death is not a threat. Death is simply a promise… Then it’s because of sin that death becomes a problem for us. (James B. Jordan, 2016 BH Conference, “Good Death and Transfiguration”)

Truly, truly, I say to you, unless a grain of wheat fall into the earth and die, it remains by itself alone, but if it die, it bears much fruit… You plant one [seed] in the ground and you get one stalk… 800 corns on it. So one becomes 800… But it has to die… But now it’s coming to life again as something else. Just like a caterpillar. It spins itself a little tomb. And then it comes out as a butterfly. Glorified. (James B. Jordan, 2016 BH Conference, “Good Death and Transfiguration”)

This is why the king, who bears the sword, must have first stood inside the grave. The magistrate who would administer capital punishment lightly is disqualified. Kingship is serious because life and death are serious, and only those who have taken their own death seriously are fit to adjudicate the deaths of others. The priest never had to carry this weight; he slaughtered animals according to a code. The king slaughters according to judgment, and must be the kind of man whose judgment can be trusted. The way his judgment becomes trustworthy is by his own dying.

It is correct to say that part of the calling of the priest is to die for others, to be a sacrifice. Israel as a nation of priests was under the laws of uncleanness (symbolic death)… But it is also true that the king is called to die. Jesus died for us as priest and as king, so that we might become priests and kings… He dies as Melchizedekal priest-king, not as Aaronic priest only. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

The fact that the king is called upon to give up his glory and “die” for others is overlooked in this set of answers, because of the notion that sacrificial death is associated only with priesthood. This is a significant error, which we must see if we are to begin to understand the Biblical teachings regarding life and history. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

Job is a fitting example. His friends exhibit simplistic wisdom and it fails in their hands because the case exceeds their reach. Job learns, and the reader learns, that wisdom ends in faith, not in formula. The last move of the wise man, confronted with the whirlwind, is silence. And this, too, is a kind of death. It is the death of the claim to comprehend.

What are the four wisdom books? Proverbs. No, not Psalms. Ecclesiastes. Job and Song of Solomon. Those are the four books about how to be a king. Four king books. Job is the king of the land of Edom. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Death I”)

While law and obedience are associated with the Sinaitic Era, wisdom and skill are associated with the Kingdom Era. The books of Law are given through Moses, while the books of wisdom are given through Solomon. It seems very likely, then, that Solomon was the author of Job… The book of Job, then, is not just about the sufferings of a righteous man… It is also about chaos in the body politic, and the position of the suffering king within that chaos. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Horizons, 1989–2007 archive)

Solomon, the Bride, and the Feast: Wisdom’s Consummation

Jordan and his associates also bring into their teaching the notions of feast and bride, thus making kingship and wisdom inherently nuptial. Jordan reads Proverbs 8 and Proverbs 31 together with the Song of Songs; Lady Wisdom is not a metaphorical accessory but the very personification of the mature kingly state. She is the one by whom kings reign. She is the competent woman of Proverbs 31; engaged in trade, in real estate, in manufacture, whose hands grip the spindle and whose lamp burns late. That is to say, she is the image of kingly dominion gathered into an adult life. The Song of Songs is the erotic consummation of this same complex: the king and his bride meet in a garden that has become a banqueting house, and their union is the proper end of the maturation sequence.

Peter Leithart writes:

It should be recalled, too, that the Proverbs are written by a King to a Prince… The dramatic premise of the book of Proverbs is this: A Prince must determine whether Lady Wisdom or Dame Folly will be his princess… The answer to our dramatic question is given in the final chapter of the book, the well-known Proverbs 31. It is no accident that the Proverbs ends with a celebration of the excellent wife. In the drama of Proverbs, the excellent wife is Lady Wisdom from the earlier chapters. (Peter J. Leithart, “The Dramatic Structure of Proverbs,” Biblical Horizons archive)

This structure and these characters are generally analogous to the major structures and characters of the Bible. The first prince, Adam, chose to follow the word of his adulterous wife (2 Cor 11:1–3), and ended up, as the Proverbs say, in Sheol. The Last Adam listened intently to the Word of His Father, and died to win a spotless Bride. Now He praises His bride in the gates; she is an excellent wife. (Peter J. Leithart, “The Dramatic Structure of Proverbs”)

From Jordan’s own treatment of Proverbs 8 wisdom:

Wisdom is not simply knowledge or even common sense. In the Biblical sense, wisdom has to do with making things and controlling things. Wisdom is practical. Thus, in Proverbs 8:30, wisdom is a “master workman.” Wisdom “knows how” as well as “knows what.” (James B. Jordan, Biblical Horizons archive)

The feast stands to the kingly stage as the sacrifice stands to the priestly. Where the priest ministers inside a tent, mediating between God and people through blood, the king throws a banquet in his hall, presiding over a joyful community of adults who eat meat and drink wine and sing. The Lord’s Supper combines both: Christ’s body is the priestly bread, his blood is the kingly wine; and thereby becomes the liturgical rehearsal of this entire sequence. Every Sunday, the church dies and rises, eats bread and drinks wine, is a priest on its knees and a king at table. The eschaton toward which the whole sequence bends is a wedding feast, because the mature church is a bride, and the mature Christ is a bridegroom who throws a banquet.

Look at the whole history of the Lord’s Supper. The cup was removed from the laity for centuries until the Hussites came along and demanded that they be given wine as well as bread, and the church excommunicated them all and they had to fight wars about it. (James B. Jordan, 2010 BH Conference, “Wine, Women, Song” Lecture 1)

This business of taking bread and breaking it, because what you eat tonight is broken bread, means that Jesus’ death has been given to you so that you can die. And what you drink tonight is poured out wine. It’s actually been taken out of a bottle and poured out into those things. And you drink it so that when you die and you pour out your life, it counts for something. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 2)

Christian worship as it has developed, especially in the West, has the same shape:
1. Announcement of God — Call to Worship;
2. Transition from old to new — Confession and Absolution;
3. Laws — the Word;
4. Blessings and curses — the Lord’s Supper;
5. Arrangements for the future — Benediction and Dismissal
This shape arises from the heart of the covenant renewal itself.
(James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “The Literary Shape of the Covenant”)

The Prophetic Overflow: Speech That Reshapes the World

At the far end of the sequence stands the prophet. If the king still acts in the world through sword and scepter, the prophet has passed beyond action into speech. At this final stage, the saint does very little, but what he says reorients the nations. The prophet is a dying king whose voice is outliving his power. Old age gathers its authority into the single instrument that is left—the word—and that word, if the prophet has kept faith, carries more weight than armies. Gray hair, as Proverbs says, is a crown.

At the end of life, you don’t do things anymore. It’s speaking. The king acts, the elder speaks. And what he says, if he has really learned wisdom… then he has the super wisdom to know exactly what things to say: to cause David to repent instantly; to know exactly what things to say to cause his grandchildren to look at the world in a new way and to start things a different way. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

In the Bible, a prophet is one of God’s chief counselors, whom God consults before He acts (Amos 3:7; 7:1–6; Genesis 20:7; 18:16–33). The prophet is the mature image of God, now woven into God’s fellowship as a junior partner in His Council. Becoming prophets is a third phase of our lives, our eldership, when we have not only acquired wisdom, but have tested our wisdom through years of being “kings” and now have acquired the ability to pass on both law and wisdom to others, those coming after us. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

The prophets Elijah and Elisha were human chariots of God (2 Ki. 2:12; 13:14). So was Ezekiel to be, and since now all of God’s people are prophets, so are we all to be. God is to ride enthroned on us, and we are to move at His direction. (James B. Jordan, Chariot of Fire, 1991)

In Jordan’s vision, the prophets from Elijah onward are preparing for the end of the old creation by speech. They do not build a new order themselves; they announce it and thereby call it forth. This is why the prophetic age is always apocalyptic; it culminates in fire. And this is why Pentecost, for Jordan, is the moment at which the Spirit of prophecy is universalized; every Christian in the new covenant is now a prophet, a king, and a priest, with the full maturation sequence miniaturized into each baptized life. The cosmic story has leapt into the individual biography, and what Israel traced over centuries, the Christian must trace over a lifetime.

On Pentecost, this Presence-fire was distributed as tongues to the Church, which carries its judgment and blessing to the four corners of the earth… The disciples were made chariots of fire in Acts 2 when tongues of fire came upon them, but when they united other people into their fellowship, they did so by sprinkling water on them (Acts 2:38). (James B. Jordan, Chariot of Fire, 1991)

We have moved from the priestly Old Creation to the kingly New Creation, but our kingship consists of words. It is a prophetic kind of kingship, and as history moves along the Church will become more and more mature as a prophetic host. Finally, after the day of judgment, the Church will be fully mature. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

The Cosmic-Historical Sweep: Childhood of the World to Maturity of the Church

Behind all of this is a story about the creation itself. God made the world immature, destined to mature. He made Adam a child-priest in a small garden sanctuary: not because a child-priest was the goal, but rather presenting the goal of maturity to him. Israel’s long tutelage under law was the childhood of the redeemed humanity. The Davidic-Solomonic monarchy was its adolescence. The prophets were its teachers at the threshold of adulthood. Christ’s death and resurrection are the moment at which the redeemed humanity comes of age; Pentecost is the moment at which the mature Spirit is poured out on all flesh, not only on a priestly caste. The New Covenant is therefore structurally adult, structurally prophetic; the church’s refusal to inhabit this maturity is a refusal of Pentecost itself.

Yet it is the destiny of this race of men to mature into a holy host… the fact that men are to mature from glory to glory (2 Corinthians 3:18), becoming ever more glorious in time, while the angels were created glorious at the outset, again indicates that the angelic host forms a picture of the goal of human maturation: from fetal “formlessness” to “angelic” glory. (James B. Jordan, Through New Eyes, 1988)

It was man’s task to build the world, carrying it from glory to glory, and making it a fit house for God. God dwells in heaven, but He wants also to dwell on earth, when man has made it ready for Him. (James B. Jordan, Through New Eyes, 1988)

Each epoch’s glory is real, and each subsequent epoch’s glory is greater. This is glory-to-glory (2 Corinthians 3): not a straight line of constant improvement, but an ascent by stages, each of which is a new plateau that required a death to reach. It is the same shape at every scale. It runs through cosmic history, through Israel’s biography, through Christ’s life, through the church’s history, through a single Christian’s years.

Western theology usually uses the word “glorification” to refer only to the final phase of human life, after the resurrection. The Bible, however, speaks of growing from glory to glory. Glorification is a work of the Spirit that begins in immaturity and ends in full maturity. We are fully glorified at the end, but we are in a process of glorification throughout our lives. The history of the covenants is a history of progressive glorification. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics)

In each case there is a transition through death into resurrection, a passage from darkness to greater light, an evening before a new day. This is how God’s Spirit acted in Genesis 1, and it is the same way He acts in Bible history. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

From these two examples, which could be multiplied billions of times, we can see that the passage from priest to king to prophet is not something distinctively “religious,” but is in fact the essence of human life and growth. We are moving through these phases all the time, not only in small ways, but also in the larger course of our entire lifespan. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

The Critique of Modern Infantilism

Jordan’s pastoral critique follows directly from this. Much of modern evangelicalism and some of modern Reformed life is arrested at the priestly, childhood stage. Its concerns are the concerns of a well-trained child: personal conversion, rule-keeping, boundary-policing, the memorization of verses, the fear of the world, the anxious anticipation of the end. These are not wrong, any more than childhood is wrong. But they are not the goal. When a church refuses to grow into kingly wisdom—when it refuses to take up adult responsibility for art, politics, education, economics, the raising of its grandchildren—it leaves the kingly office vacant, and other powers move in. A church that will not be a king will be ruled by one. A church that will not exercise wisdom will be managed by cleverness.

We tend to miss [the holy war] because we’re so concerned about sin and redemption, but most of the Gospels are concerned with Jesus beating up demons… part of those controversies come from people who are only concerned about sin and salvation and evangelism, and they get very nervous if somebody starts talking about Christian government and applying the kingdom to all of life and those kinds of things. They don’t have that broader perspective. (James B. Jordan, 2005 BH Conference, “Wisdom and Death II”)

My topic this week is wine, women, and song, and also war… these are three things that are important, essential, new characteristics of the new covenant glory, which the church has done a bad job of affirming over the centuries… These are areas in which the church and Christendom have pretty regularly failed to be what God intends. And so there must be something important about these things, because somebody doesn’t want us to think about them. (James B. Jordan, 2010 BH Conference, “Wine, Women, Song” Lecture 1)

Today, let’s talk about wine for a few minutes… it’s part of childishness and other problems, but it’s also because somehow principalities and powers fear these things and they’re part of our warfare… Why was [the cup] rejected? Why is it a problem? (James B. Jordan, 2010 BH Conference, Lecture 12)

Jordan diagnoses the same condition more systematically two decades earlier:

In this essay, we have only skimmed the surface of the problems faced by the American Church in the area of music… [I have analyzed the problems in terms of] the economic poverty of the frontier era; the anti-intellectualism of the revivalistic heritage; the development of sentimentalism in the 19th century; the loss of the constraints of liturgy, or else the loss of the constraints of exclusive psalmody; the studied pursuit of infantilism in the 20th century. (James B. Jordan, Reconstruction of the Church, 1985)

The solution is not to skip priesthood and grasp directly at wisdom; that produces cleverness without righteousness, which is folly with a vocabulary. The solution is to live the priestly stage faithfully, accept the deaths that come at its end, and walk into the kingly stage with a limp. It is to sit long at the feet of the law, to eat bread in the garden, and then, when the breaking comes, to consent to the breaking and step into a larger room where wine is poured.

Now, you don’t acquire the ability to do that unless you spend a number of years being a priest and learning right and wrong. So you have to grow up as a child and be obedient and be spanked when you’re disobedient and learn right and wrong, and once you get that down inside yourself, then you can have these challenges where you’ve got much more difficult and complex decisions to make, and you kind of have to grope your way along. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1)

[We ask you to] make us more fully the kind of priestly bread that you want us to be, and give us the wisdom and the kingly wisdom that comes from the wine as well, and help us to live more faithfully as priests, and with greater insight and understanding as kings. (James B. Jordan, “One Life, Many Deaths,” Lecture 1, closing prayer)

Summary

In Jordan’s theology, wisdom is the name of the second stage of maturation through which God brings his covenant people and every individual Christian. It is what obedience becomes when it has been internalized, tested by time, broken open by suffering, and raised again on the far side of a death. It stands between the priestly age of law and childhood and the prophetic age of vision and elderhood, and it is entered only through crisis. Its paradigm figures (Solomon, Job, David, Jacob, Joseph) all limp in some fashion, because all of them have been wounded into kingship. Its literary canon (Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes, the Song of Songs) spans the range from the buoyant confidence of young obedience to the dark silence of the suffering saint to the consummating joy of the wedding feast. Its virtues are patience and long time sense; its instruments are the sword of judgment and the cup of wine; its telos is a bride, a banquet, and a world ruled in the Spirit. Jesus is the wisdom of God because he is the one who has walked the whole sequence: he became a child under the law, died the kingly death, rose into prophetic speech, and now gives his Spirit so that his people may, generation by generation, grow up into him. To seek wisdom in Jordan’s sense is therefore to consent to grow up: to accept that the life of faith will be marked by breakings, that its authority will come with a limp, that its fruits will ripen slowly, and that its final form will be a feast.

There is one covenant in three large phases. These phases of maturation in history reflect in time the eternal maturation of the Son by the work of the Spirit. These three phases can be characterized as:

1. Priestly, childhood;
2. Kingly, adulthood;
3a. Historical prophetic, eldership;
3b. Full prophetic, resurrection in glory.

These 3–4 phases of the one covenant cover all of human history, and they also cover the full course of the normal human life… These 3–4 phases also cover smaller periods of history at various levels, as God’s Spirit causes humanity to mature through expanding cycles. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Covenant Phases in the Bible”)

The meaning of Jesus’ perfect human life is not only that He came to die for our sins, but also that He gives to us His perfect life. He gives it to us not so much as a model, for we do not in fact do the same things Jesus did, but as a type. A type is a deep-pattern impressed into us by the Holy Spirit. We are placed in union with Jesus, and the deep-pattern of His life is given to us… By eating His body and drinking His blood, we are restored and renewed so that we can move properly through these three phases of life. (James B. Jordan, Biblical Theology Basics, “Priest, King and Prophet”)

We can do so, confident that the limp of victory in Christ will mature into the dance of eternity. (James B. Jordan, Primeval Saints, 1988)

Bibliography

Quotations above are taken from James Jordan’s lectures and writings. Principal sources:

  • Through New Eyes (1988)
  • Primeval Saints (1988)
  • Chariot of Fire (1991)
  • The Sociology of the Church (1986)
  • Christian Piety: Deformed and Reformed (1986)
  • Reconstruction of the Church (1985)
  • Biblical Horizons archive (1989-2007)
  • Biblical Theology Basics essays (2002–2007)
  • “One Life, Many Deaths” (three lectures)
  • 2005 Biblical Horizons Conference on Ecclesiastes and Wisdom Literature
  • 2010 Biblical Horizons Conference on Wine, Women, Song
  • 2016 Biblical Horizons Conference on Death.

A few quotations are from Peter Leithart rather than James Jordan, and are noted as such.

Written by Scott Moonen

May 3, 2026 at 8:59 pm

Parable

leave a comment »

A parable of catholicity

Grampa and gramma: You’re no grandson of ours unless you move back to our house!
Pawpaw and memaw: You’re no grandson of ours unless you move back to our house!

Applications

  1. This is absurd; we don’t have to choose between our grandparents. History is structured in such a way that the farther back we look, the more fathers we find, not the less.
  2. It is self-evident that honoring, appreciating, and living in fellowship with someone doesn’t require you to agree with them in every way or submit to all of their demands. Very likely love will sometimes require you to do the opposite.
  3. It appears comforting to have many things provided and taken care of for you (or so it may seem!). But if you gave in to their demands, you would be robbing yourself of opportunities that God is providing for you to grow by wrestling with complex and difficult things. You would be placing a limit on your maturity and faithfulness. In fact, we recognize that this is generally true of all paternalistic despotism, whether it exists in the family, the state, or the church: it is ultimately infantilizing; it devours life rather than giving and multiplying it.

Of course, my parable is too generous by far to Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy. As things work out in reality, it is an organized gang of distant cousins insisting that you move in with them.

Written by Scott Moonen

April 28, 2026 at 8:50 am

Posted in Worship

Regeneration

leave a comment »

Jesus and Nicodemus discuss regeneration in John 3:

Nicodemus said to Him, “How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter a second time into his mother’s womb and be born?”

Evangelicalism commonly reads this as referring to individual regeneration, but I’m convinced that is not in view. Nicodemus, a ruler of the people, knows that the church-body is dead; she is still living in wickedness and is still undergoing a kind of exile from God’s favor. In the background are several passages from the prophets. Ezekiel 6 refers to the death of Israel:

And I will lay the corpses of the children of Israel before their idols, and I will scatter your bones all around your altars.

And Ezekiel 37 refers to her resurrection:

The hand of Yahweh came upon me and brought me out in the Spirit of Yahweh, and set me down in the midst of the valley; and it was full of bones. Then he caused me to pass by them all around, and behold, there were very many in the open valley; and indeed they were very dry. And he said to me, “Son of man, can these bones live?”

So I answered, “O Lord Yahweh, You know.”

Again he said to me, “Prophesy to these bones, and say to them, ‘O dry bones, hear the word of Yahweh! Thus says the Lord Yahweh to these bones: “Surely I will cause breath to enter into you, and you shall live. I will put sinews on you and bring flesh upon you, cover you with skin and put breath in you; and you shall live. Then you shall know that I am Yahweh.” ’ ” . . .

Then he said to me, “Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. They indeed say, ‘Our bones are dry, our hope is lost, and we ourselves are cut off!’ Therefore prophesy and say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord Yahweh: “Behold, O my people, I will open your graves and cause you to come up from your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel. Then you shall know that I am Yahweh, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up from your graves. I will put my Spirit in you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land. Then you shall know that I, Yahweh, have spoken it and performed it,” says Yahweh.’ ”

I believe that Nicodemus’s question is like Ezekiel’s reply and like Mary’s answer to the angel: how can this be? Also in the background is Israel’s resurrection from the womb-ground in Isaiah 66:

“Before she was in labor, she gave birth;
Before her pain came,
She delivered a male child.
Who has heard such a thing?
Who has seen such things?
Shall the earth be made to give birth in one day?
Or shall a nation be born at once?
For as soon as Zion was in labor,
She gave birth to her children.
Shall I bring to the time of birth, and not cause delivery?” says Yahweh.
“Shall I who cause delivery shut up the womb?” says your God.
“Rejoice with Jerusalem,
And be glad with her, all you who love her;
Rejoice for joy with her, all you who mourn for her;
That you may feed and be satisfied
With the consolation of her bosom,
That you may drink deeply and be delighted
With the abundance of her glory.”

Nicodemus understands this much. What he does not understand is that this corporate regeneration—in fact, the regeneration of the cosmos—would be accomplished by the rebirth, from the earth, of one man, the representative of Israel.

Written by Scott Moonen

April 25, 2026 at 8:36 am

Posted in Biblical Theology

The kingdom and the power, redux

with one comment

Earlier I claimed that James Jordan had not drawn a straight-line connection between the church’s abandonment of paedobaptism and our culture’s practice of abortion. At the time I was focused primarily on Jordan’s lectures, but I’ve searched again through his written materials. Jordan’s 1989 essay, “The Holy War in America Today: Some Observations on Abortion Rescues,” does in fact address this connection directly. This is an outstanding essay that I commend to you in its entirety. But here are some quotes from this essay on this particular point. These particular quotes originate from Jordan’s earlier 1985 essay, “Abortion: A Cause and a Cure”—

Abortion is clearly murder, so there is absolutely no question about the will of God in this matter. All the Church needs to do is bind and loose properly, and society will conform. There is no doubt about it, because the Bible says it. In Christ, the Church has been restored to the place of Adam as guardian of the Garden; the cherubim have gone back home to heaven. We now have the keys. If the dragon is loose in the garden, killing children, the fault for this lies solely with the Church. What does Scripture say? All power has been given to Christ and is administered through the Church. All power. All. Not part. Not some. Not “enough.” All. The enemy, then, has NO power. We have to say, then, that the reason children are murdered in our society is because the Church has failed to guard at this point.

At those points where the Church fails to guard society, sin breaks out. If the Church fails to maintain its governing function, and fails to use the sword of excommunication properly and consistently, then the state will also fail to wield the sword of iron, and there will be a rise of lawlessness and crime. If the Church fails to protect the weak, then the weak will become the prey of the violent. . . .

In this way, the Church in the West ceased offering the protection of Christ to the children of the West. The results have been slow in coming, but are now devastating. Ancient Israel faced the same choice. They were supposed to circumcise their children and bring them to Passover. When they ignored the festivals (as they almost always did), they fell into child sacrifice, giving their children to Molech. So it was then, and so it is today. We now face rampant child pornography, child molestation, incest, and abortion. This will not cease until the Church once again welcomes the little children to Jesus’ lap. . . .

Working to pass civil laws will help, but is in the category of “little help” (Dan. 11:34, a reference to political relief); indeed, in my opinion the state will not change its stand on abortion until the Church reforms herself. Let the Church reform herself, and confess that by denying the seal of God’s covenant to the children of this society, she has left them open to attack. When the Church is reformed, then the promise of the gospel is that the rest of society will get in line soon enough, and sooner than we think.

Written by Scott Moonen

April 20, 2026 at 7:11 pm

Fall

leave a comment »

Numbers 12 is a recapitulation of the fall in the garden in Genesis 3:

  1. A man and a woman grasp at something beyond what God has given to them
  2. The lie they believe is a lie about God’s character, that he is a father who gives stones in place of bread
  3. God seeks them, calls them, stands with them at the sanctuary. Interestingly, the text in Numbers suggests that God was not accustomed to walk with Miriam and Aaron as he was with Adam and Eve.
  4. The sin is dealt with by giving a new covering and by banishment from the sanctuary

Incidentally, I find it interesting that Moses, Miriam, and Aaron were all over 80 years old at this time.

If this identification is true, we should look for the pattern of a triplicate fall in Numbers. Miriam and Aaron commit their sin in the sanctuary place against the Father. Then, in Numbers 16, we see the brother-sin of Cain and Abel repeated when the sons of Kohath attack their brother Aaron. As with Cain and Abel, one brother’s offering is accepted by God, and the other’s is rejected. This connection, I think, instructs us to read this passage with the understanding that there is something murderous growing in the hearts of the sons of Kohath. Then, finally, in Numbers 25 we see the sin against the Spirit, the intermarriage of the sons of God with the daughters of men, repeated as Israel commits harlotry with the Midianite women.

If the pattern holds, we should next expect to see God making a new creation by a passage through water that preserves God’s people. Although this does not happen in the book of Numbers, it is exactly what happens when Israel crosses the Jordan.

Written by Scott Moonen

April 20, 2026 at 6:18 am

Posted in Biblical Theology

Limp

leave a comment »

James Jordan has a complex of very helpful things to say about wisdom, patience, faith, maturity, and a long time sense. These play into the repetitive progression he identifies of priest, king, and prophet. I want to extract out of this one particular insight he has on Jacob’s limp, which he associates primarily with the kingly phase of life.

From Studies in Genesis # 29, on Genesis 32,

Now, why is this done to Jacob? Well, it’s a point that we’ve made before, and that is that in union with Christ, all of God’s people limp. In union with Christ, all of God’s people limp. The crushing of the heel is passed to all of us. The Church always limps, and yet is victorious for the simple reason that the other side has its head crushed. But the bruising of the thigh signifies a wound delivered to the seed and it’s a picture then that the seed will suffer.

From The Life of Jacob # 40,

The sign that you’re going to function in the land as a king and that you have the brother’s blessing, that’s going to be this thigh wound, the limp. Now, where is this headed? I mean, this is kind of off the top of my head, except that after 25 years of studying biblical theology, I think that we can do this without any difficulty. If God’s ultimate goal is for us to be full witnesses in the world and have the Spirit, and we start with circumcision, which is painful for a couple of days, then we get this thigh wound that means that we can’t even walk very well and really cripples us. What is going to happen here that is the ultimate form of this to make us ready for witnesses in the world and make the Spirit come? Yeah, death. The cross is a good way of putting it, see? We’re moving here. . . .

Jacob is mighty enough to wrestle with God. So the sun coming up is a sign of Jacob’s strength, but, you see, paradoxically, his strength consists of his limp. Our strength consists of humility. This image associates the godlike power of the sun with the seeming weakness of the limping man. And not just the power of the sun, but what in Genesis 1, what does it say the sun, moon, and stars were set up to do? What do they represent? They are rulers and governors. The greater light for ruling the day, the smaller light for ruling the night. He set them in the firmament to rule the day and night. So, the shining forth of light and ruling are parallel. And Jacob is now like the sun. He comes in as a ruler. Not anymore a servant priest, but now a ruler. But, one who limps, one who’s weak. The limp is a sign of true power, and true power lies in humility and sacrifice.

From The Life of Jacob # 42,

So to be a king means to limp. It doesn’t mean you never do anything. It just means you have this quality of life. And changing Jacob’s name to Israel, which then becomes the name usually used for the nation, means the entire nation has that name, God-wrestlers. The entire nation bears the meaning of God-wrestlers whose seed is consecrated and sacrificed. So Israel becomes God-wrestlers. Israel becomes the circumcised priestly nation that also limps and has humility.

From The Life of Jacob # 43,

We had made the point last time that Esau, the Edomites, are also circumcised, but they don’t get the foot wound, they don’t get the thigh wound; that the limp has to do with humility. Circumcision has to do with being made a priest. If you are limping, you’re going to have to be careful. You can’t go up and fight like you used to. The whole bunch of guys are coming at you, and you can’t hardly stand without a staff. You’re in trouble, and you need some subtlety and wisdom. Direct action that you had maybe when you were younger isn’t going to work.

The Edomites and Esau in the Bible have this meaning of being a counterfeit priestly nation. A nation that’s priestly, or claims to be, and has circumcision, but that does not have humility. And so who hold their priesthood in pride and arrogance. And we were talking about how the book of Obadiah pictures them as dwelling in the rocks, in the cleft of the rock, like Moses and Elijah were in the cleft of the rock, and having a counterfeit kind of wisdom and claiming to be God’s people.

Well, the true church doesn’t look all that powerful. This frustrates people because our enemies don’t limp, but their head is crushed. So they can’t endure. If you want to compare it, go back to Genesis 3. One side gets a foot wound, which is very troublesome. Your foot hurts every day. You never know when you’re going to slip and hurt it again. It means you can’t walk very fast. You go through the wilderness. You make three steps forward and two steps back. And the adversary are all standing out there on two feet, and they look like they’re just real strong, shoulder to shoulder, marching at you. And we look like we’re all over the place in different denominations, fighting over this, that, and the other. But their head is crushed. Despite appearances, they don’t have any overall organization; whereas, despite appearances, we do have complete organization because our head is alive. Jesus is alive.

And by the Holy Spirit, all of this chaos that we see in the church is actually perfectly organized and synchronized development towards something in the future. It’s just that we can’t see it. It’s like if you made a mosaic, and we’re going to take this entire floor here and put a mosaic on it using little tiles an eighth of an inch square, all different colors. And I had a map up here, and I go over here, and I put a little red one-eighth of an inch by one-eighth by an inch square tile here, and a little blue one over here, and a green one over here, and another red one next to it. And you would have no idea what the pattern is. I would, because I’ve got a diagram that tells me I’m painting by numbers or I’m making a mosaic by numbers. I’m putting a little bit here and a little bit there. But I’m not starting in one corner and developing. I’m doing a little bit over here in China, a little bit over here in the Presbyterian Church, a little bit over here in the Catholic Church, a little bit over here in this Pentecostal group, and a little bit over here raising up some Mormons in order to challenge us to think new about other things we hadn’t thought about before, and over here raising up communism to force us to think about things that we wouldn’t normally think about. I’m doing this and I’m doing that.

And those of us who are near to it in this world, we don’t see the pattern. But there is a pattern. But from our perspective, it looks like chaos. That’s the part of the limpingness of the church. And it means that we don’t appear powerful. But we have a head for whom all this is organized. It’s being done in exactly the right order. Meanwhile they look like they’re powerful but their head has been crushed and they’re not actually organized; and you see this in that anytime you get wicked people together they wind up fighting each other. That never happens in the church; well it happens to us because we still have the flesh, but it happens to them preeminently. It’s always the Tower of Babel over and over again. It’s Deja Babel all over again every time they try to do anything.

That’s why the conspiracy view of history isn’t really true. Because it really is true that the Russian communists and the Chinese communists couldn’t get along because Mao Zedong had ambitions and so did Stalin. They might close ranks occasionally against us, but they’re not going to get along. And Ho Chi Minh had ambitions and that’s why he wouldn’t get along with Mao Zedong. The wicked don’t get along with each other except very briefly because each one has his own ambitions to play God.

So while it can look as if Esau is coming out with 400 men all in a rank and you’ve got this little group of women and kids and servants who are used to being farmers and you’re limping along, the fact is Esau is not well organized and they won’t endure. And we are organized and we will endure. We limp, but our head is resurrected, and our limp is a large dance from the viewpoint of eternity.

Written by Scott Moonen

April 18, 2026 at 11:42 am

New creation

leave a comment »

Some of [Paul’s] hearers believe the gospel that he preached, which means that they trusted in the resurrection, left the old creation and entered the new creation. To press that just a little further. Paul’s message to them is that the resurrection is indeed the gateway of history. Before the resurrection, the world was different. It was a time of ignorance that God overlooked, meaning before the resurrection, God had exercised great patience with the nations and did not give them what they deserved. We don’t have time this morning, but Paul talks about this very same thing in Acts 14 and Romans 3, and you can look it up there. Paul often refers to the former times, but now after the resurrection, something is significantly different. Now Jesus has come and shed his blood for sins. Jesus is with God, ready to forgive sins, but commands all men everywhere to repent. All men of all nations must confess their sins, trust in Jesus, as Lord and stop living in ignorance and sin. The resurrection marks that hinge in history. Everything that comes before it belongs to the old world. And everything that comes after the empty tomb is a new heavens and a new earth. When Jesus died, the first creation, the old creation, died with him. And his resurrection was the birth of a new reality for the cosmos. The resurrection wasn’t a one-off strange miracle in the old world. The resurrection was the first day of the new world. 2 Corinthians 5:17 says, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. There is a new creation. Old things have passed away. Behold, all things have become new. When you’re united to Jesus by faith, you join the new creation.

We’re used to speaking about the new heavens and the new earth as something that hasn’t happened yet. We think of new heavens and new earth as something that’s way, way, way in the future. We’re looking forward to it. But the reality is with the resurrection, the new order of the cosmos has already begun. How is heaven new? How is heaven new and different from what it was before the resurrection? Well, there’s something very significant about heaven now, and that is today a man rules in heaven. The man, Jesus, is enthroned in heaven, and he rules over everything, and he is the man before which we will all stand as judge. Not only that, but today heaven is populated with the souls of men. If you remember Jesus’s parable of Lazarus and the rich man, those righteous souls are not in heaven. They’re not before the throne of God, right? He says they’re in Abraham’s bosom. They’re waiting for the sacrifice to be made so that men’s souls can enter the presence of God. Back when we studied Revelation, remember one of the narratives we followed through Revelation is that account of angelic elders getting up from their thrones and then human elders taking their place. Heaven is new. Heaven is changed with the enthronement of Jesus, the ascension of Jesus and his enthronement over all the cosmos.

And the earth is under new administration as well. Because Jesus has been vindicated, because he’s been enthroned, the power of Satan to deceive the nations has been broken. Satan is on a chain. He no longer has any kind of dominion over the earth. His functions are severely limited. Satan is not all-powerful. He’s not omniscient. And instead of Satan’s dominion, now the Spirit of God has been poured out in strength upon the world, upon the church, empowering the church to take dominion and rule in history, in time, over creation.

In the old world, before the resurrection, corruption spread, impurity spread. How much of the law is taken up with how to counter all manner of ceremonial uncleanness? There’s uncleanness that can get in the walls of the house and in your clothes and in your cups and dishes, uncleanness everywhere. That’s not the way it is anymore. In the new creation, life spreads. Corruption doesn’t spread. Understanding and wisdom spreads. Purity spreads. In the old creation, it’s as if the people of God are always about to go extinct. They’re always surrounded by their enemies. They dig wells and the Canaanites come behind them and fill up the wells. The women are always barren. The land does not cooperate with them. It’s as if the land wars against them. There’s famine and pestilence and problems all the time. The creation doesn’t cooperate with them in the old covenant. In the new creation, the land cooperates. Blessings abound. The church spreads throughout all the world. Unabated life just gets sweeter and sweeter and more pleasant all the time.

Think about the way that now God blesses our smallest efforts. Just a little faithfulness explodes into a great bounty of fruitfulness by God’s mighty Spirit. This is a new creation. Romans chapter 8 spoke of this. We studied this a few weeks ago, that the creation was subject to futility, awaiting what? Awaiting the revealing of the sons of God. As the sons of God are revealed, as the gospel is preached and men are delivered, so is creation. Everything has been turned around by the resurrection. Death no longer has esteem. The grave no longer has the last word. Death had no victory over Jesus and therefore cannot have victory over those who are in Jesus.

This is what it means to be a Christian, to accept without reservation, without cynicism, without skepticism, to accept the reality of the resurrection, to understand that it is the most important event in human history. And that because of the resurrection of Jesus, we live in a different world. Because of the resurrection, the world is not the same as it used to be. This is the world where Jesus reigns. This is the world where his kingdom spreads. This is the world where death does not get the last word. Life gets the last word. This is the world where the triune God has made himself known. This powerful preaching of the resurrection, this powerful truth emboldened the early Christians to go through the ancient world spreading the message of Jesus. The explosive growth of the church is inexplicable apart from the earth-shattering message of the cross and the empty tomb. And wherever they take this message to confront Caesars and governors and philosophers and pagan priests and merchants and slaves, wherever they go, the truth prevails. Lives are transformed. Men and women are restored as they enter the new creation with Jesus as king.

(Duane Garner, The Resurrection Changes Everything)

Written by Scott Moonen

April 17, 2026 at 4:44 pm

Witness

leave a comment »

Pipe Creek Farm is not simply a few hundred acres of dirt, some clusters of old barns and outbuildings, power machines, a herd of cattle, a few beeves and hogs or a flock of sheep.

Our farm is our home. It is our altar. To it each day we bring our faith, our love for one another as a family, our working hands, our prayers. In its soil and the care of its creatures, we bury each day a part of our lives in the form of labor. The yield of our daily dying, from which each night in part restores us, springs around us in the seasons of harvest, in the produce of animals, in incalculable content.

A farmer is not everyone who farms. A farmer is the man who, in a ploughed field, stoops without thinking to let its soil run through his fingers, to try its tilth. A farmer is always half buried in his soil. The farmer who is not is not a farmer; he is a businessman who farms. But the farmer who is completes the arc between the soil and God and joins their mighty impulses. We believe that laborare est orare—to labor is to pray.

In that sense, the farm is our witness. It is a witness against the world. By deliberately choosing this life of hardship and immense satisfaction, we say in effect: The modern world has nothing better than this to give us. Its vision of comfort without effort, pleasure without the pain of creation, life sterilized against even the thought of death, rationalized so that every intrusion of mystery is felt as a betrayal of the mind, life mechanized and standardized—that is not for us. We do not believe that it makes for happiness from day to day. We fear that it means catastrophe in the end. We fear it if only because standardization leads to regimentation, and because the regimentation that men distrust in their politics is a reflection of the regimentation that they welcome unwittingly in their daily living.

We make use of as much mechanization as we cannot escape, as suits our daily needs, but does not rule our lives. We are not going back to the grain cradle, the candle or the ox cart. We seek that life that will give us the greatest simplicity, freedom, fruitful work, closest to the earth and peaceful, slow-moving animals. We know that, at this hour of history, we cannot do this completely. We realize that we have undertaken this life late in our lives and under heavy handicaps of fixed habit and ignorance. But we were willing to offer our lives for the venture because it is a way of groping toward God and because we knew nothing better in life to give our children.

We bought this farm in my second year at Time. We knew something of the hardships we must expect. Soon we knew more of them. But we had decided that our children must grow up close to the soil, familiar with labor, embedded in the nation by attending its public schools and taking spontaneous part in its routine work and play. Above all, we wanted to place them beyond the smog of the great cities, seeing few newspapers, seldom hearing the radio, seldom seeing motion pictures, untouched by the excitements by which the modern world daily stimulates its nervous crisis. We wished them never to hear the word Communism until they had developed against it, and the modern mind from which it springs, the immunity of a full and good life.

(Whittaker Chambers, Witness, 517–518)

Written by Scott Moonen

April 16, 2026 at 6:58 am

Posted in Quotations

Static on the line

leave a comment »

We’re going to talk about how to talk in church, how to sing in church, and how to read in church. . . . The reason I read [Revelation 15]—and we could have read several passages out of Revelation or other places—is to notice this vast number of people singing together this hymn, which we’ll sing in a minute. . . . But they all sing together.

Now I can tell you something about these people. There was nobody singing a whole lot louder than everybody else. Nobody’s voice was sticking out because they were singing chorally and together. And that’s really the reason that I read this passage. So why don’t we do that?

But first of all, let’s talk about how to talk in church and how to sing in church. . . . I was recently at a conference and we prayed the Lord’s Prayer together and there was one person who said,

Hallowed be thy name.
Thy kingdom come.
[rushed] Thy will be done on earth.

And of course it stood right out because he was doing it his way. So then I asked later on, he said, well, it seems to me that’s what it means. I said, well, maybe. I don’t think so. I think it means:

Hallowed be thy name on earth as it is in heaven.
Thy kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven.
Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.

And that’s why we take a pause.

But more importantly, you need to pray with everybody else. At home, you can pray it your way. In church, you pray with everybody else. You subordinate yourself and become part of the group. You can’t be an American. You’ve got to be in with the group. We are one-anothering one another. And you’re not one-anothering one another if you’re doing your own thing in the prayer. I remember years ago, there was a man in a church at which I was an associate pastor, and he would pray the Lord’s Prayer his own way every week.

[exaggerated sing-song] Our Father who art in Heaven.

And you could hear it. You know, everybody else is praying chorally. And he was way out there. He eventually wound up being excommunicated. [laughter] [joking] We took it seriously. But you know, his I-do-my-own-thing eventually led to his counterfeiting money and then telling us that we could just, you know, if we didn’t think he ought to be doing that, we didn’t have any authority over him. So he wound up being excommunicated.

But you see, this is not the time for you to shine. When we pray, when we read together, we read together. That means we read in a kind of a chant fashion. . . . In these prayers we read together, we fall into a rhythm. Our voices go up and down just a little bit. Our voices get loud and soft just a little bit. And there is a rhythm. You know, as a musician, I could write that rhythm out.

Our Father
Who art in heaven,
Hallowed be thy name,
Thy kingdom come,
Thy will be done,
On earth . . .

You know, there’s a slightly shorter pause there. . . . There’s a rhythmical difference. But we all do it. And you’ve always done it.

Of course, you have to be alert when you’re in a church. Are they saying trespasses or debts? If they say trespasses, they’re going to say forever and ever. If they say debts, they’re just going to say forever. And if they say sins, all bets are off. And if you’re in a Catholic church, they’re just going to say, deliver us from evil, amen. They’re not going to say the doxology, so, it’s really confusing.

It’s like saying the Apostles’ Creed, or saying the Nicene Creed, or singing it. We do it together.

Now, the same thing is true of singing. You need to sing at the same level as everybody else. . . . I’ve been in churches where somebody behind me decided that it was opera time. . . . You think, come on, man, you know, we don’t want to hear you as opposed to everybody else. You’re not really thinking of being part of the community—without intending to, perhaps. You’re doing your thing. You’re shining. Beware of that. I know most of you don’t have this.

It’s even worse if you’re a tenor. Some people decide they want to harmonize, and that’s fine. But if you’re harmonizing louder than everybody else, everybody can hear you, especially if you’re a tenor because tenor notes are one-third higher than the melody notes normally. . . . So we sing together. We subordinate our personality a little bit to be part of everything else.

Now you notice that I stepped back from the microphone when I sang. You don’t need me singing into the mic, or singing super loud so that you hear the pastor trying to lead. In liturgical worship, you don’t have a song leader. Who is the leader who leads in the singing in traditional worship? It’s not a guy doing this. It’s not a pastor singing into a mic. Who is it? The Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit leads the singing. He creates this environment and you all fit into it and you all become part of it. . . .

How many of you served in the military? . . . Remember doing close order drill? You learn to march together. And it gets to be kind of fun. Right flank march. Left flank march. There’s a certain amount of pleasure that comes from that. But if everybody’s walking at his own pace, you don’t get that (unless you’re crossing a bridge, then you have to break step so as not to shatter the bridge). There are all these rules.

Alright, so in our singing, if you’re a pastor, step back a little bit from the mic. And I step back when I sing to hear—if we’re singing a hymn. Why? Because I want to sing with you, not at you. If there was lots of liturgical space back here, as there might be in a traditional church, it’d be much easier for me even to turn around and sing with you without feeling weird. But if I did that, I’m singing at the wall. So that kind of thing isn’t really possible in a space like this. But again, the idea is to sing with. I want to sing with you in the hymns. I only stand here if I’m singing in dialogue with you.

Giving you rules. These things are written down in books. But you probably don’t have those books. So, I do.

Now I get to the controversial part. Which is, every book I have on my shelf will tell you, when you read the scripture in church, you read it as if you were reading it with other people. You read it in union with Christ. You read it in union with the angels. Which means, you don’t read it dramatically.

Now, this is a real temptation in our circles, and I have friends who do it, and I have friends who would say, “Jim, I just don’t agree.” And I have to say, “man, I’m the guy with the stole on here.” I’m telling you. This is what you hear, and people, some of the finest saints I know, will read like this, but I wish they wouldn’t.

And Jesus cried out with a loud voice, [loud] Lazarus, come forth! [normal] And he who was . . .

Wait a minute. It was Jesus who cried out with a loud voice. I’m just telling you about it. Now I could tell you about the lunch that we had today.

Mr. Myers and I were having lunch and I said, [loud] Jeff Meyers said this!

And I could be very dramatic about it. . . . But that’s not the way we report things, is it? And when you read the Bible, it should be read simply. Even dramatic parts.

[wailing] Jesus wept.

No, don’t do that. Because even though you’re not aware of it and even though you have the best of intentions, people are focusing on you. They’re not hearing the Word of God. They’re hearing your dramatic power, which may not be all that great. It might be good. It might not be.

So, they don’t do this in our seminaries. But there was a time when you had been trained to modulate your voice. Go up a little bit. Go down a little bit. Get a little bit louder, a little bit softer. But don’t throw out huge amounts of enthusiasm. And the other thing is, almost all the Bible is written in lines. If you heard me read, I read in phrases and lines. . . .

Again, the Word of Yahweh came to me saying,
Son of man, take up a lamentation over the king of Tyre
And say to him, Thus says the Lord God,
You had the seal of perfection,
Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
You were in Eden, the garden of God.
Every precious stone was your cover.

I’m chanting that text. I’m everything but singing it on pitch. Originally, that would have been chanting. When it says the scroll was given to Jesus in the synagogue and He read from Isaiah, He was reading it on pitch. It would sound weird to you if I did it. You’d say, one more weird thing. . . . You know how many traditional service books have got notes, reciting tones? It’s strange. We don’t do this, but we should—even reading—read like it’s coming from heaven. And you’re just one of several people reading. So if you have an opportunity to read the Bible in public, I enjoin you to read it. And those of you that are pastors, you can take me out and beat me up later on, but seriously, I think there is less static on the line if you read this way.

(James Jordan, Biblical Horizons 2012 Conference: Back to Basics)

Written by Scott Moonen

April 15, 2026 at 5:55 am

Posted in Quotations, Worship

Irreconcilable

leave a comment »

Faced with the opportunity of espionage, a Communist, though he may sometimes hesitate momentarily, will always, exactly to the degree that he is a Communist, engage in espionage. The act will not appear to him in terms of betrayal at all. It will, on the contrary, appear to him as a moral act, the more deserving the more it involves him in personal risk, committed in the name of a faith (Communism) on which, he believes, hinges the hope and future of mankind, and against a system (capitalism) which he believes to be historically bankrupt. At that point, conscience to the Communist, and conscience to the non-Communist, mean two things as opposed as the two sides of a battlefield. The failure to understand that fact is part of the total failure of the West to grasp the nature of its enemy, what he wants, what he means to do and how he will go about doing it. It is part of the failure of the West to understand that it is at grips with an enemy having no moral viewpoint in common with itself, that two irreconcilable viewpoints and standards of judgment, two irreconcilable moralities, proceeding from two irreconcilable readings of man’s fate and future are involved, and, hence, their conflict is irrepressible. (Whittaker Chambers, Witness, 420)

See also: Truth

Written by Scott Moonen

April 13, 2026 at 4:34 pm

Posted in Quotations